If you're seeing this message - that means some of our site's content isn't loading properly. Click here to reload and try another method.

Lesson 8 – Conclusion

As the final task, explore all your notes on assessment that you’ve made throughout this learning module. Work on consolidating them into a coherent, transparent, aligned plan, and connect them to your course assessments, finding ways to integrate choice regarding the type and format of the assessment, perhaps providing an option to co-create with peers and/or with you as the instructor. To do this, explore some of the transparency methods explored in the following resource: https://www.tilthighered.com/transparent-methods

Choose one example and think about how you may implement it in your assessments and classroom. If some do not align with your teaching philosophy, think about ways in which you can modify them.

  1. Ultimately, remember that the first step towards effective assessments is critical awareness of your teaching perspectives and values, the reasons behind them, and how they shape student engagement in your course (what we explored in the first section).
  2. The second step is understanding the importance of the different types of learner-centered assessments and how they may support student belonging (second section – the “why”).
  3. Finally, exploring ways in which you can craft such assessments (through constructive alignment, co-creation and transparency)—three strategies that can honour diverse ways of knowing, create more inclusive learning environments, and empower all students to demonstrate their understanding.

Works Cited

Anderson, L., & Krathwohl, D. A. (2001). Taxonomy for learning, teaching and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Longman.

Ashford-Rowe, K., Herrington, J., & Brown, C. (2013). Establishing the critical elements that determine authentic assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(2), 205–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2013.819566

Bayraktar, B., Ragupathi, K., & Troyer, K. A. (2025). Building trust through feedback: A conceptual framework. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 13, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.20343/teachlearninqu.13.7

Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher Education, 32(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871

Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed.). Open University Press. Blum, S. D. (Ed.). (2020).

Bovill, C. (2020). Co-creation in Learning and Teaching: The Case for a Whole-Class Approach in Higher Education. Higher Education, 79(6), 1023–1037. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-019-00453-w

Brookfield, S. D. (2012). Teaching for critical thinking: Tools and techniques to help students question their assumptions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Carless, D., & Boud, D. (2018). The development of student feedback literacy: enabling uptake of feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(8), 1315–1325. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1463354

Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in university assessment: Learning from award-winning practice. Routledge.

Centre for Teaching Excellence. (n.d.). Bloom’s taxonomy. University of Waterloo. https://uwaterloo.ca/centre-for-teaching-excellence/catalogs/tip-sheets/blooms-taxonomy

Fink, L. D. (2013). Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass.

Fostaty Young, S. (2021). Introduction to the ICE model. In S. Fostaty Young, M. Troop, J. Stephenson, K. Pegley, J. Johnston, M. Morton, C. Bracci, A. O’Riordan, V. Michaelson, K. J. Hill, & S. Watson (Eds.), Teaching, learning, and assessment across the disciplines: ICE stories (Chapter 1). eCampusOntario. https://ecampusontario.pressbooks.pub/storiesofteachinglearningandassessmentacrossthedisciplines/chapter/introduction-to-the-ice-model/

Fostaty Young, S., & Wilson, R. J. (2000). Assessment and learning: The ICE approach. Portage & Main Press. International Center for Academic Integrity (ICAI). (2021). The fundamental values of academic integrity (3rd ed.). https://academicintegrity.org/resources/fundamental-values

Kohn, A. (2011). The case against grades. Educational Leadership, 69(3), 28–33. Retrieved from http://www.alfiekohn.org/article/case-grades/

Könings, K. D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F., Stassen, L., & Ramani, S. (2020). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher, 43(8), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464

Lewis, K. L., Stout, J. G., Pollock, S. J., Finkelstein, N. D., & Ito, T. A. (2016). Fitting in or opting out: A review of key social-psychological factors influencing a sense of belonging for women in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 12(2), August 1, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.12.020110

Maslow. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0054346

Morris, T. H., Bremner, N., & Sakata, N. (2023). Self-directed learning and student-centred learning: A conceptual comparison. Pedagogy, Culture & Society. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2282439

Nicol, D., & Kushwah, L. (2024). Shifting feedback agency to students by having them write their own feedback comments. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 49(3), 419–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2265080

Nortvedt, G.A., Wiese, E., Brown, M. et al. (2020). Aiding culturally responsive assessment in schools in a globalising world. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 32, 5–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-020-09316-w

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68

Steele, C., Gower, G., & Bogachenko, T. (2024). Creating and enacting culturally responsive assessment for First Nations students in higher education settings. Australian Journal of Education, 68(2), 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/00049441241258496

Wiggins, G. (1998). Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass.

Wiggins, G., & McTighe, J. (2005). Understanding by design. ASCD. https://files.ascd.org/staticfiles/ascd/pdf/siteASCD/publications/UbD_WhitePaper0312.pdf

Winkelmes, M.-A. (n.d.) TILT Higher Ed website: https://www.tilthighered.com/

Winkelmes, M.-A. (2013). Transparency in teaching: Faculty share data and improve students’ learning. Liberal Education, 99(2). https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1094742